Evidence-Based Medicine
Spot Knowledge
Definition: Integration of best research evidence + clinical expertise + patient values
Goal: Maximise quality & duration of life, improve decision-making
🔄 EBM 5 Steps
Formulate clinical question
Search for evidence
Critically appraise evidence
Apply to practice
Evaluate outcome
Evidence-Based Medicine: Definition, Process, and Levels of Evidence
Definition and Purpose
Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is an approach that integrates clinical expertise with the best available evidence from systematic research. The aim is to maximize both the quality and duration of patients’ lives. This approach emphasizes the integration of empirical evidence, clinical experience, and patient values.
Fundamental Steps
The EBM process consists of five stages:
Formulating an answerable clinical question.
Identifying and retrieving the evidence.
Critical appraisal of the evidence.
Integrating the evidence into clinical practice.
Evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of the application.
The appraisal of evidence is not limited to randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Other study designs presenting consistent findings may also contribute to clinical practice. Studies are classified according to their quality and reliability.
Levels of Evidence and Study Types
Therapeutic Studies
Level I: High-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or homogeneous systematic reviews.
Level II: Lower-quality RCTs, prospective comparative studies.
Level III: Case-control studies, retrospective comparative studies.
Level IV: Low-quality cohort studies or case series.
Level V: Expert opinion.
Prognostic Studies
Level I: High-quality prospective studies and systematic reviews thereof.
Level II: Retrospective studies or lower-quality prospective studies.
Level III: Case-control studies.
Level IV: Case series.
Level V: Expert opinion.
Diagnostic Studies
Level I: Development of diagnostic criteria tested in consecutive series of patients, validated against an appropriate “gold standard.”
Level II–IV: Development of criteria tested in more limited samples or against lower-quality standards.
Level V: Expert opinion.
Economic and Decision Analyses
Level I: Robust data from multiple sources, supported by sensitivity analyses.
Level II: Analyses based on limited data and resources.
Level III–IV: Analyses based on weak assumptions or limited sensitivity testing.
Level V: Expert opinion.
Key Concepts in Evidence-Based Medicine
Frequently used concepts in EBM include:
Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR): The difference in event rates between treatment and control groups.
Relative Risk Reduction (RRR): The proportional risk reduction achieved by the intervention.
Number Needed to Treat (NNT): The number of patients that must be treated to prevent one adverse outcome.
Likelihood ratios, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values: Indicators of diagnostic test performance.
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT): A design in which treatment and control groups are assigned randomly, considered the strongest source of evidence.
Meta-analysis and Systematic Review: Methods combining results from multiple studies to generate stronger evidence.
Type I error (α) and Type II error (β): The probabilities of false-positive and false-negative results, respectively.
Clinical Relevance
The evidence-based approach provides guidance not only in treatment selection but also in diagnosis, prognosis, and health economics. The reliability of clinical decision-making depends on the level of evidence employed. High-quality studies offer clinicians stronger and more dependable guidance.
Conclusion
Evidence-based medicine grounds healthcare decision-making on a scientific basis. Its primary goal is to maximize patient benefit. The integration of clinical expertise, patient preferences, and robust scientific evidence constitutes the foundation of modern medical practice.
References
1. StatPearls. Evidence-Based Medicine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. PMID: 35412347.
2. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P, Greenhalgh T, Heneghan C, Liberati A, et al. The Oxford Levels of Evidence 2. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine; 2011.
3. Puljak L. The difference between evidence-based medicine, evidence-informed practice, and evidence generation. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;145:1–3. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.002
